История изменений

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243556A1.pdf

##%^%$^%#$%^$^%$^

This may not be mere academic speculation. A few troubling restrictions have appeared in broadband service plan agreements. Professor Tim Wu of the University of Virginia School of Law catalogued some of these restrictions for a symposium here last year. According to Wu, these restrictions have included things such as cable companies’ early efforts to impose restrictions on use of virtual private networks, WiFi and home networking equipment and on operation of servers in the home. Moreover, press reports allege that at least one cable company has not provided enough guidance to intensive broadband users regarding the bandwidth limits of their service plans. The evidence is unclear, however, as to whether and to what degree these restrictions have been enforced against consumers. Nor is there much evidence that consumers have been denied from getting what they want, even if they are willing to change service plans. Further, some providers counter any service plan restrictions have been reasonable attempts to manage their networks to prevent service disruption to other customers. They also claim that the few restrictions that have popped up have been removed when it became clear they were not necessary to ensure service quality. Based on what we currently know, the case for government imposed regulations regarding the use or provision of broadband content, applications and devices is unconvincing and speculative. Government regulation of the terms and conditions of private contracts is the most fundamental intrusion on free markets and potentially destructive, particularly where innovation and experimentation are hallmarks of an emerging market. Such interference should be undertaken only where there is weighty and extensive evidence of abuse.

Про 2004 вопрос закрыт. Washington Post в своем репертуаре постит партийное говно и ложь, а тайлганнер его жрет.

Хотя нет не закрыт, остается вопрос о том, что мешает тайлганнеру пройтись по своей же ссылке?

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243556A1.pdf

##%^%$^%#$%^$^%$^

This may not be mere academic speculation. A few troubling restrictions have appeared in broadband service plan agreements. Professor Tim Wu of the University of Virginia School of Law catalogued some of these restrictions for a symposium here last year. According to Wu, these restrictions have included things such as cable companies’ early efforts to impose restrictions on use of virtual private networks, WiFi and home networking equipment and on operation of servers in the home. Moreover, press reports allege that at least one cable company has not provided enough guidance to intensive broadband users regarding the bandwidth limits of their service plans. The evidence is unclear, however, as to whether and to what degree these restrictions have been enforced against consumers. Nor is there much evidence that consumers have been denied from getting what they want, even if they are willing to change service plans. Further, some providers counter any service plan restrictions have been reasonable attempts to manage their networks to prevent service disruption to other customers. They also claim that the few restrictions that have popped up have been removed when it became clear they were not necessary to ensure service quality. Based on what we currently know, the case for government imposed regulations regarding the use or provision of broadband content, applications and devices is unconvincing and speculative. Government regulation of the terms and conditions of private contracts is the most fundamental intrusion on free markets and potentially destructive, particularly where innovation and experimentation are hallmarks of an emerging market. Such interference should be undertaken only where there is weighty and extensive evidence of abuse.

Про 2004 вопрос закрыт. Washington Post в своем репертуаре постит партийное говно и ложь, а тайлганнер его жрет.

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243556A1.pdf

##%^%$^%#$%^$^%$^

This may not be mere academic speculation. A few troubling restrictions have appeared in broadband service plan agreements. Professor Tim Wu of the University of Virginia School of Law catalogued some of these restrictions for a symposium here last year. According to Wu, these restrictions have included things such as cable companies’ early efforts to impose restrictions on use of virtual private networks, WiFi and home networking equipment and on operation of servers in the home. Moreover, press reports allege that at least one cable company has not provided enough guidance to intensive broadband users regarding the bandwidth limits of their service plans. The evidence is unclear, however, as to whether and to what degree these restrictions have been enforced against consumers. Nor is there much evidence that consumers have been denied from getting what they want, even if they are willing to change service plans. Further, some providers counter any service plan restrictions have been reasonable attempts to manage their networks to prevent service disruption to other customers. They also claim that the few restrictions that have popped up have been removed when it became clear they were not necessary to ensure service quality. Based on what we currently know, the case for government imposed regulations regarding the use or provision of broadband content, applications and devices is unconvincing and speculative. Government regulation of the terms and conditions of private contracts is the most fundamental intrusion on free markets and potentially destructive, particularly where innovation and experimentation are hallmarks of an emerging market. Such interference should be undertaken only where there is weighty and extensive evidence of abuse.

Про 2004 вопрос закрыт.