История изменений
Исправление
sanyock,
(текущая версия)
:
Или вот это:
https://habrahabr.ru/post/277393
/
http://notessysadmin.com/round-robin-default-gateway-and-openvpn
Round-robin default gateway
Round-robin default gateway включен следующей командой:
ip route add default scope global nexthop via $GW1 dev $IF1 weight 1 nexthop via $GW2 dev $IF2 weight 1 nexthop via $GW3 dev $IF3 weight
а тут:
https://serverfault.com/questions/372504/round-robin-default-gateways-on-linux
пишут:
Multiple default gateways is rarely going to have the desired affect. If one of the gateways is down you're going to lose the traffic that is sent to it.
What are you trying to achieve by using more than one gateway? Dynamic routing, 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP) or a combination of the two is probably closer to the solution you are looking for.
Т.е. рекомендуют:
1) Dynamic routing - это как раз BGP?
2) 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP)
3) «or a combination of the two» - это 1) + 2) одновременно?
ну и из простых способов, получается, к NextHop добавляется LaCP?
Исправление
sanyock,
:
Или вот это:
https://habrahabr.ru/post/277393/
Round-robin default gateway
Round-robin default gateway включен следующей командой:
ip route add default scope global nexthop via $GW1 dev $IF1 weight 1 nexthop via $GW2 dev $IF2 weight 1 nexthop via $GW3 dev $IF3 weight
а тут:
https://serverfault.com/questions/372504/round-robin-default-gateways-on-linux
пишут:
Multiple default gateways is rarely going to have the desired affect. If one of the gateways is down you're going to lose the traffic that is sent to it.
What are you trying to achieve by using more than one gateway? Dynamic routing, 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP) or a combination of the two is probably closer to the solution you are looking for.
Т.е. рекомендуют:
1) Dynamic routing - это как раз BGP?
2) 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP)
3) «or a combination of the two» - это 1) + 2) одновременно?
ну и из простых способов, получается, к NextHop добавляется LaCP?
Исправление
sanyock,
:
Или вот это:
https://habrahabr.ru/post/277393/
Round-robin default gateway
Round-robin default gateway включен следующей командой:
ip route add default scope global nexthop via $GW1 dev $IF1 weight 1 nexthop via $GW2 dev $IF2 weight 1 nexthop via $GW3 dev $IF3 weight
а тут:
https://serverfault.com/questions/372504/round-robin-default-gateways-on-linux
пишут:
Multiple default gateways is rarely going to have the desired affect. If one of the gateways is down you're going to lose the traffic that is sent to it.
What are you trying to achieve by using more than one gateway? Dynamic routing, 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP) or a combination of the two is probably closer to the solution you are looking for.
Т.е. рекомендуют:
1) Dynamic routing - это как раз BGP?
2) 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP)
3) «or a combination of the two» - это 1) + 2) одновременно?
Исправление
sanyock,
:
Или вот это:
https://habrahabr.ru/post/277393/
Round-robin default gateway
Round-robin default gateway включен следующей командой:
ip route add default scope global nexthop via $GW1 dev $IF1 weight 1 nexthop via $GW2 dev $IF2 weight 1 nexthop via $GW3 dev $IF3 weight
а тут:
https://serverfault.com/questions/372504/round-robin-default-gateways-on-linux
пишут:
Multiple default gateways is rarely going to have the desired affect. If one of the gateways is down you're going to lose the traffic that is sent to it.
What are you trying to achieve by using more than one gateway? Dynamic routing, 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP) or a combination of the two is probably closer to the solution you are looking for.
Т.е. рекомендуют: 1) Dynamic routing - это как раз BGP? 2) 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP) 3) «or a combination of the two» - это 1) + 2) одновременно?
Исправление
sanyock,
:
Или вот это:
https://habrahabr.ru/post/277393/
Round-robin default gateway
Round-robin default gateway включен следующей командой:
ip route add default scope global nexthop via $GW1 dev $IF1 weight 1 nexthop via $GW2 dev $IF2 weight 1 nexthop via $GW3 dev $IF3 weight
а тут:
https://serverfault.com/questions/372504/round-robin-default-gateways-on-linux
пишут:
Multiple default gateways is rarely going to have the desired affect. If one of the gateways is down you're going to lose the traffic that is sent to it.
What are you trying to achieve by using more than one gateway? Dynamic routing, 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP) or a combination of the two is probably closer to the solution you are looking for.
Исходная версия
sanyock,
:
Или вот это:
https://habrahabr.ru/post/277393/
Round-robin default gateway
Round-robin default gateway включен следующей командой:
ip route add default scope global nexthop via $GW1 dev $IF1 weight 1 nexthop via $GW2 dev $IF2 weight 1 nexthop via $GW3 dev $IF3 weight
а тут:
https://serverfault.com/questions/372504/round-robin-default-gateways-on-linux
пишут:
Multiple default gateways is rarely going to have the desired affect. If one of the gateways is down you're going to lose the traffic that is sent to it.
What are you trying to achieve by using more than one gateway? Dynamic routing, 802.3ad link aggregation (LaCP) or a combination of the two is probably closer to the solution you are looking for.