LINUX.ORG.RU

История изменений

Исправление greenman, (текущая версия) :

Немного другой случай — ARM платформа.

Swap on SBC

Interesting tests, especially the lzo vs lz4 outcomes. We found the same difference last year and went for lzo zram in the end because of the overall performance benefit and marginal difference in compression

Lzo was faster and less cpu intensive overall despite lz4 being better on paper (and from the opinions of almost every internet warrior). In our case the difference came from the compression overhead of lz4 being much higher than lzo and while the decompression of lz4 was faster it wasn't enough to claw back what it loses in compression time. Interestingly when we ran the same tests on Intel cpu's (Core m3 4.5W) instead of Arm64 then the situation was reversed with lz4 coming out on top

И...

Interestingly when we ran the same tests on Intel cpu's (Core m3 4.5W) instead of Arm64 then the situation was reversed with lz4 coming out on top

Исправление greenman, :

Немного другой случай — ARM платформа.

Swap on SBC

Interesting tests, especially the lzo vs lz4 outcomes. We found the same difference last year and went for lzo zram in the end because of the overall performance benefit and marginal difference in compression

Lzo was faster and less cpu intensive overall despite lz4 being better on paper (and from the opinions of almost every internet warrior). In our case the difference came from the compression overhead of lz4 being much higher than lzo and while the decompression of lz4 was faster it wasn't enough to claw back what it loses in compression time. Interestingly when we ran the same tests on Intel cpu's (Core m3 4.5W) instead of Arm64 then the situation was reversed with lz4 coming out on top

Исходная версия greenman, :

Немного другой случай — ARM платформа.

Swap on SBC

[qoute]Interesting tests, especially the lzo vs lz4 outcomes. We found the same difference last year and went for lzo zram in the end because of the overall performance benefit and marginal difference in compression

Lzo was faster and less cpu intensive overall despite lz4 being better on paper (and from the opinions of almost every internet warrior). In our case the difference came from the compression overhead of lz4 being much higher than lzo and while the decompression of lz4 was faster it wasn't enough to claw back what it loses in compression time. Interestingly when we ran the same tests on Intel cpu's (Core m3 4.5W) instead of Arm64 then the situation was reversed with lz4 coming out on top