История изменений
Исправление soko1, (текущая версия) :
Кстати, нарыл интересную инфу:
A lot of the older SSD+Linux guides recommend using the ext2 filesystem because it avoids the extra writes of a journaling filesystem like ext3 or ext4, which will extend the life of your drive. With the advent of TRIM support (see below), ext2 is probably not the best choice. Yes, TRIM commands can be run on ext2 filesystems, but with two drawbacks:
Ext2 only supports offline TRIM – In other words, the filesystem must be mounted read-only.
You must manually execute the TRIM commands using hdparm, or its wrapper script wiper.sh.
Ext4 filesystems, on the other hand, don’t have these restrictions, allowing the operating system to take care of all the trimming for you behind the scenes. Since the journaling function can be disabled on ext4 filesystems, it’s probably a better choice than ext2. Just make sure you realize that without a journal your filesystem is more susceptible to corruption and data loss if it is not cleanly unmounted (if the power goes out, for example). But since you’re reading this you probably are willing to take that chance in order to extend the life of your drive.
Получается что вместо моего ext2 в / лучше использовать ext4 без журнала. Хотя по большому счёту и это пофиг, т.к. она почти всегда кроме обновлений и доустановки нужного софта находится в read_only. Но инфой решил поделиться и с вами)
Исходная версия soko1, :
Кстати, нарыл интересную инфу:
A lot of the older SSD+Linux guides recommend using the ext2 filesystem because it avoids the extra writes of a journaling filesystem like ext3 or ext4, which will extend the life of your drive. With the advent of TRIM support (see below), ext2 is probably not the best choice. Yes, TRIM commands can be run on ext2 filesystems, but with two drawbacks:
Ext2 only supports offline TRIM – In other words, the filesystem must be mounted read-only.
You must manually execute the TRIM commands using hdparm, or its wrapper script wiper.sh.
[b]
Ext4 filesystems, on the other hand, don’t have these restrictions, allowing the operating system to take care of all the trimming for you behind the scenes.[/b] Since the journaling function can be disabled on ext4 filesystems, it’s probably a better choice than ext2. Just make sure you realize that without a journal your filesystem is more susceptible to corruption and data loss if it is not cleanly unmounted (if the power goes out, for example). But since you’re reading this you probably are willing to take that chance in order to extend the life of your drive.
Получается что вместо моего ext2 в / лучше использовать ext4 без журнала. Хотя по большому счёту и это пофиг, т.к. она почти всегда кроме обновлений и доустановки нужного софта находится в read_only. Но инфой решил поделиться и с вами)