История изменений
Исправление trynoval, (текущая версия) :
Почитал оригинальное послание лидера проекта дебиан.
Things may have changed since our last GR on the issue. There are 1033 non-overridden instances of lintian detecting a service unit without an init.d script [7]. The false positive rate seems high especially for packages that break their systemd integration. There's been discussion on debian-devel about moving to using service units as the default rather than init scripts [8].
So perhaps sysvinit and init scripts have had their chance and it is time to move on. We could move away from init scripts as the default representation. We could stop caring about sysvinit (which isn't quite the same thing but is related). That would leave non-linux ports in an unfortunate position. But right now there are no non-linux ports in the main archive. So perhaps we don't even care about that. Again, a change, but a change that we can ask ourselves if we are ready to make.
В то время как он хочет делать подвижки в плане поддержки elogind, он одновременно предлагает выкинуть отовсюду инит-скрипты и перейти эксклюзивно на юниты сисямдэ.
Исправление trynoval, :
Почитал оригинальное послание лидера проекта дебиан.
Things may have changed since our last GR on the issue. There are 1033 non-overridden instances of lintian detecting a service unit without an
init.d script [7]. The false positive rate seems high especially for packages that break their systemd integration. There's been discussion on debian-devel about moving to using service units as the default rather than init scripts [8].
So perhaps sysvinit and init scripts have had their chance and it is time to move on. We could move away from init scripts as the default representation. We could stop caring about sysvinit (which isn't quite the same thing but is related). That would leave non-linux ports in an unfortunate position. But right now there are no non-linux ports in the main archive. So perhaps we don't even care about that. Again, a change, but a change that we can ask ourselves if we are ready to make.
В то время как он хочет делать подвижки в плане поддержки elogind, он одновременно предлагает выкинуть отовсюду инит-скрипты и перейти эксклюзивно на юниты сисямдэ.
Исправление trynoval, :
Почитал оригинальное послание лидера проекта дебиан.
Things may have changed since our last GR on the issue. There are 1033 non-overridden instances of lintian detecting a service unit without an
init.d script [7]. The false positive rate seems high especially for packages that break their systemd integration. There's been discussion on debian-devel about moving to using service units as the default rather than init scripts [8].
So perhaps sysvinit and init scripts have had their chance and it is time to move on. We could move away from init scripts as the default
representation. We could stop caring about sysvinit (which isn't quite the same thing but is related). That would leave non-linux ports in an unfortunate position. But right now there are no non-linux ports in the main archive. So perhaps we don't even care about that. Again, a change, but a change that we can ask ourselves if we are ready to make.
В то время как он хочет делать подвижки в плане поддержки elogind, он одновременно предлагает выкинуть отовсюду инит-скрипты и перейти эксклюзивно на юниты сисямдэ.
Исправление trynoval, :
Почитал оригинальное послание лидера проекта дебиан.
Things may have changed since our last GR on the issue. There are 1033
non-overridden instances of lintian detecting a service unit without an init.d script [7]. The false positive rate seems high especially for packages that break their systemd integration. There's been discussion on debian-devel about moving to using service units as the default rather than init scripts [8].
So perhaps sysvinit and init scripts have had their chance and it is
time to move on. We could move away from init scripts as the default representation. We could stop caring about sysvinit (which isn't quite the same thing but is related). That would leave non-linux ports in an unfortunate position. But right now there are no non-linux ports in the main archive. So perhaps we don't even care about that. Again, a change, but a change that we can ask ourselves if we are ready to make.
В то время как он хочет делать подвижки в плане поддержки elogind, он одновременно предлагает выкинуть отовсюду инит-скрипты и перейти эксклюзивно на юниты сисямдэ.
Исходная версия trynoval, :
Почитал оригинальное послание лидера проекта дебиан.
Things may have changed since our last GR on the issue. There are 1033
non-overridden instances of lintian detecting a service unit without an init.d script [7]. The false positive rate seems high especially for packages that break their systemd integration. There's been discussion on debian-devel about moving to using service units as the default rather than init scripts [8].
So perhaps sysvinit and init scripts have had their chance and it is
time to move on. We could move away from init scripts as the default representation. We could stop caring about sysvinit (which isn't quite the same thing but is related). That would leave non-linux ports in an unfortunate position. But right now there are no non-linux ports in the main archive. So perhaps we don't even care about that. Again, a change, but a change that we can ask ourselves if we are ready to make.
В то время как он хочет делать подвижки в плане поддержки elogind, он одновременно предлагает выкинуть отовсюду инит-скрипты и перейти эксклюзивно на юниты сисямдэ.